Analysis
of a Film Extract – 30 Marks
|
|
Level
0 – 11
|
•
Candidates will give few indications that they have gained knowledge and
understanding of the micro features of the film they are concentrating on and
will tend to rely on 'common sense'.
•
There may be some reference to their chosen film but this will have no clear
analytical purpose.
•
There may either be little attempt at personal engagement or only a set of
personal statements that fail to demonstrate any learning.
Quality
of written communication
•
Struggles to communicate clearly.
|
Level 2
12 - 14
|
•
Candidates will show a basic ability to identify and describe specific
aspects of the micro features of film but, compared with work at higher
grades, knowledge will be insecure, generalised and with significant
inaccuracies.
•
There will be basic reference to the chosen film but only indicating basic
analysis.
•
Personal response may be strongly stated but be characterised by description
of personal feeling and unsupported assertion.
Quality
of written communication
•
Basic ability to structure ideas and use appropriate language to communicate.
|
15 - 17
|
•
Candidates will demonstrate some ability to identify and describe specific
aspects of the micro features of the film they are concentrating on.
•
This will be reflected in work that is generally accurate, though
inconsistent in its level of detail.
•
References to the detail of the micro features of film will sometimes be
clear but there will be a tendency toward imprecision.
•
Personal response may be strongly stated but lacking in any conceptual focus
on how meaning is made.
Quality
of written communication
•
Some ability to structure ideas and use appropriate language to communicate.
|
Level 3
18 - 20
|
•
Candidates will demonstrate a sound knowledge and understanding of specific
aspects of the micro features of the film they are concentrating on.
•
This will be reflected in their ability to refer in some detail and with a
generally high level of accuracy to particular films. This will be supported
by sound analysis of aspects of the micro features of film.
•
Personal response will focus on the process of making meaning(s) in
particular instances but may reveal limitations in broader conceptual
understanding or in interrogating the interaction between film and spectator.
Quality
of written communication
•
Soundly structured and reasonably accurate use of appropriate language to
communicate clearly.
|
21 - 23
|
•
Candidates will have a good knowledge and understanding of the micro features
of the film they are concentrating on.
•
This will be reflected both in their ability to refer in detail and with
accuracy to their chosen film and in their analysis of how micro features
produce meaning(s).
•
Personal response will show a competent appreciation of the production of
meaning(s) through the interaction of film and spectator.
•
However, compared with the very best candidates, more will be taken for
granted and a less exploratory approach will be adopted.
Quality
of written communication
•
Well-structured and accurate use of appropriate language to communicate
clearly.
|
Level 4
24 -30
|
•
Candidates will be distinguished by an excellent knowledge and confident
understanding of the micro features of the film they are concentrating on.
•
This will be reflected both in their ability to refer in detail and with
accuracy to their chosen film and in their analysis of how micro features
produce meaning(s).
•
Personal response will be characterised by a high level of analysis of the
production of meaning(s) through the interaction of film and spectator.
•
The interaction between film and spectator will be perceived as complex,
subtle and resistant to simplistic assumptions.
Quality
of written communication
•
Excellently structured and accurate use of appropriate language to
communicate clearly.
|
Creative Project
Applying the Micro Features of Film to Create Meaning
“Create a sequence to demonstrate how
micro features produce meanings and responses.”
WJEC
Film Studies Specification
The Creative Project
should build upon the work you have covered understanding how meaning is
created at a micro level and the consequent relationships between producers and
audiences. In other words you will be expected to show your understanding
of how films are created by producing a creative project. Your project is
not group work although you may need to ask friends to help you depending on
the complexity of your individual idea. Your Assessment Objectives are:
A03 Demonstrate the ability to devise film
projects creatively, applying appropriate planning and production skills
effectively; and
AO2 Apply knowledge and understanding,
including some of the common critical approaches that characterise the subject,
when exploring and analysing films and when evaluating their own creative
projects to show how meanings and responses are generated.
1 Aims and Context
A clarification of the aims and context
of the project to be completed on the Exam Board’s Cover Sheet FM1a. This
will be about 50 words in length.
2 Film Sequence or Short Film – 40 Marks
You must produce either a film sequence
envisaged as an extract from longer film or a complete short
film. Emphasis is on visual communication rather than dialogue. The
purpose is to demonstrate youe understanding of the micro features of
film. Therefore this coursework should definitely be a case of style over
substance. You may choose:
· A film sequence or short
film of approximately 2 minutes and containing between 10 and 25
different shots (some of which may be repeated); or
· A photographed storyboard of
between 10 and 25 different shots (some of which may be repeated). You
can use up to 5 found shots, which must be acknowledged, but
you are strongly discouraged from this unless critical to your storyboard; or
· An extended step outline of
1000 words covering between 5 and 8 scenes. This is a detailed
description of a set of scenes not a screenplay.
3 Reflective Analysis – 10 Marks
This should select key micro features of
the sequence and demonstrate how they create meanings and aim to provoke
responses in audiences. The Analysis must be 750 words in length.
You will write your Reflective Analysis after you have produced
your Micro Analysis. Your Reflective Analysis is a micro analysis but of
your own work this time!
What Do You Need to Do?
Aims & Context
This is a very important
part of the project, but you don’t actually get any marks for your work!
It explains the meanings you are trying to develop and the learning you are
applying in the practical activities. The Aims & Context also helps
you get your thoughts together – this is why a draft must be written before you
commence any production work.
· Come up with a title for the film, this locates the film in the
mind of the audience, is shows that you have genuinely thought about the nature
of the movie and that you are engaged with the task.
· Do not offer a synopsis of the sequence. You should cover
the micro features being focused on and the way in which each will be applied
to the practical work.
· Offer some sense of where the chosen sequence sis in the film
timeline and in relation to the conventions of narrative structure.
· If you are working with a particular genre or adopting a
particular style then it would be helpful to highlight how these issues will be
developed through the micro elements of film to shape the sequence.
· Finally, you need to identify what the intention is behind the
use of the micro elements involved in the production.
The Idea
The starting point!
The idea develops into an outline for a story (although remember the point is
to demonstrate understanding of the micro features of film. Keep control
of the idea to stop it spiralling off into unstructured developments.
Adopt a few simple sets of questions to keep your ideas tight, focussed and
therefore most likely to produce an effective production:
What is the situation?
/ Whose situation is it? / From whose perspective is the story to be told?
What is the central
quest? / Where do the events happen? / Who stands in the way of success?
How does the quest end?
Production
Although the final piece
will have taken you on a journey through pre-production, production and
post-production, as this is not a vocational course, only the final piece
itself is marked and neither planning material or editing sheet need to be
handed in.
However, planning is
essential to a good piece. Documents are available for you: storyboards,
lighting plots, properties list, location visit, wardrobe design, risk
assessment
Preparation
You will be given some
time in lessons to think about what you would like to produce. You may
feel that you need training in particular software or hardware in order to make
your product. If this is the case you must make this known to your
teacher and workshops will be arranged. Remember this FM1 is worth
50% of your AS course, so it can really make a difference to your final grade!
Mark Scheme
Film
Sequence – 40 Marks
|
||
Level 1
|
0 - 15
|
Level
1 is characterised by incomplete work and achievement which is uneven and
basic. Some or all of the following are characteristic:
Sequence
•
Slight and inconsistent indications of understanding of micro features
demonstrated in sequence
•
Slight and inconsistent indications of ability to realise cinematic ideas
with few indications of understanding of appropriate conventions.
Quality
of written communication
•
Struggles to communicate clearly
|
Level 2
|
16-19
|
Sequence
• Basic understanding of micro
features demonstrated in sequence
• Basic ability to use appropriate
micro features
• Basic ability to visualise,
demonstrating some understanding of appropriate conventions.
Quality of written communication
• Basic ability to structure ideas and
use appropriate language to communicate
|
20-23
|
Sequence
• Some understanding micro features
demonstrated in sequence
• Some ability to use appropriate
micro features
• Some ability to visualise,
demonstrating an understanding of appropriate conventions.
Quality of written communication
• Some ability to structure ideas and
use appropriate language to communicate
|
|
Level 3
|
24-27
|
Sequence
• Sound understanding of micro
features demonstrated in sequence
• Sound creative use of appropriate
micro features
• Sound visualisation, demonstrating
reasonable understanding of appropriate conventions
Quality of written communication
• Soundly-structured and reasonably
accurate use of appropriate language to communicate clearly
|
24-31
|
Sequence (extended step outline,
storyboard and film)
• Good understanding of micro features
demonstrated in sequence
• Good, at times creative, use of
appropriate micro features
• Good visualisation, demonstrating a
good understanding of appropriate conventions
Quality of written communication
(where relevant)
• Well-structured and accurate use of
appropriate language to
communicate clearly
|
|
Level 4
|
28-31
|
Sequence
• Excellent understanding of micro
features demonstrated in sequence
• Excellent, creative use of
appropriate micro features
• Excellent visualisation,
demonstrating high degree of understanding of appropriate conventions
Quality of written communication
• Excellently structured and accurate
use of appropriate language to communicate clearly.
|
32-40
|
Sequence
• Excellent understanding of micro
features demonstrated in sequence
• Excellent, creative use of
appropriate micro features
• Excellent visualisation,
demonstrating high degree of understanding of appropriate conventions.
Quality of written communication
• Excellently structured and accurate
use of appropriate language to communicate clearly
|
|
Mark Scheme
Reflective
Analysis – 10 Marks
|
||
Level 1
|
0 - 3
|
•
Slight and inconsistent indications of ability to reflect analytically on the
micro features of sequence.
Quality
of written communication
•
Struggles to communicate clearly.
|
Level 2
|
4
|
•
Basic ability to reflect analytically on how the sequence uses micro features
to make meanings for audiences.
Quality
of written communication
•
Basic ability to structure ideas and use appropriate language to communicate.
|
5
|
•
Some ability to reflect analytically on how the sequence uses micro features
to make meanings for audiences.
Quality
of written communication
•
Some ability to structure ideas and use appropriate language to communicate.
|
|
Level 3
|
6
|
•
Sound analysis on how the sequence uses micro features to make meanings for
audiences.
Quality
of written communication
•
Soundly-structured and reasonably accurate use of appropriate language to
communicate clearly.
|
7
|
•
Good, at times perceptive, analysis of how the sequence uses micro features
to make meaning(s) for audiences.
Quality
of (written) communication
•
Well-structured and accurate use of appropriate language to communicate
clearly.
|
|
Level 4
|
8-10
|
•
Excellent, perceptive analysis of how the sequence uses micro features to
make meanings for audiences.
Quality
of written communication
•
Excellently structured and accurate use of appropriate language to
communicate clearly.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment